Technology is already far ahead of our biological capabilities. I do not understand the Technocrats and their overlords. They want to be physically better than, or at least on a par with, the technology they are creating. That is daft.
Look, let me give a really simple example:
Many many moons ago, our ancestors picked up a rock and smashed it. They then used one shard to cut the flesh off a beast that they were eating. Then they found one particular stone could set things on fire. That was technology doing something that we could not. Did our ancestor think that they wanted to grow stony appendages? No! They just carried a few shards around with them.
We now have devices which remember more stuff than we can, access more stuff than we can, interface with more stuff than we can and even buy more stuff than we ever knew existed. Do we need to compete with this machine or grow a device beneath our skin? No. We just need to carry one around with us but, just like our ancestor with his piece of flint, we need to be very careful not to cut ourselves or set ourselves on fire.
Maybe Musk and his overlords, with all the money that they have, are not as smart as they want us to believe.
Maybe they should listen to Neil Oliver who slams our 'leaders' for their lack of character.
Incredibly well said Frances. You know I agree with you.
Thank you so much for sharing the link to Neil's latest which I haven't yet had time to watch, listen to. I will do so shortly after I find my dear errant cat, Arthur who seems to have disappeared into the deep fog enveloping these hills.
So true that when civilizations use power and enforced dependency to weaken their population it works. The weakened people then project weakness and choose weak leaders. Weak men and women make dangerous and Insidious associates and enemies. When we select for weakness we get it. My dogs understand this.
This is reinforced by education as a tool of indoctrination and warehousing, by corporate power, etc. How stupid will we become before we learn who and what to reject?
I originally, reluctantly joined Twitter in 2014 when I was helping to support a campaign to bring awareness to one of the survivors, a whistleblower regarding rampant sexual abuse in one of the many children's homes in the UK. It can be effective for things like that. I don't post very often on Twitter, not even my Substack blogs but promote others on there. I also find that it can be quite helpful sometimes when doing research.
As I have expressed in this post and others, I do not feel that Musk has good intentions. He is a very useful puppet for the dark cabal.
The short answer in my opinion: No. (But maybe we will be delightfully surprised?) I've learned in my life to *never* trust anyone (especially a public figure) until I'm shown good fruit produced from the branches of their tree. And even then, I stay leery and suspicious because *all* human beings can be corrupted and stray down a dark path no matter how altruistic, benevolent, sincere and "good" they may seem on the surface.
Technology is already far ahead of our biological capabilities. I do not understand the Technocrats and their overlords. They want to be physically better than, or at least on a par with, the technology they are creating. That is daft.
Look, let me give a really simple example:
Many many moons ago, our ancestors picked up a rock and smashed it. They then used one shard to cut the flesh off a beast that they were eating. Then they found one particular stone could set things on fire. That was technology doing something that we could not. Did our ancestor think that they wanted to grow stony appendages? No! They just carried a few shards around with them.
We now have devices which remember more stuff than we can, access more stuff than we can, interface with more stuff than we can and even buy more stuff than we ever knew existed. Do we need to compete with this machine or grow a device beneath our skin? No. We just need to carry one around with us but, just like our ancestor with his piece of flint, we need to be very careful not to cut ourselves or set ourselves on fire.
Maybe Musk and his overlords, with all the money that they have, are not as smart as they want us to believe.
Maybe they should listen to Neil Oliver who slams our 'leaders' for their lack of character.
This is superb.
https://youtu.be/4Vsjf47Mgnk
Incredibly well said Frances. You know I agree with you.
Thank you so much for sharing the link to Neil's latest which I haven't yet had time to watch, listen to. I will do so shortly after I find my dear errant cat, Arthur who seems to have disappeared into the deep fog enveloping these hills.
So true that when civilizations use power and enforced dependency to weaken their population it works. The weakened people then project weakness and choose weak leaders. Weak men and women make dangerous and Insidious associates and enemies. When we select for weakness we get it. My dogs understand this.
This is reinforced by education as a tool of indoctrination and warehousing, by corporate power, etc. How stupid will we become before we learn who and what to reject?
KW, I so appreciate your analytical comments and how you express your thoughts. Thank you as always for sharing.
Elon is the worst (best?) controlled op of the movie so far.
I agree.
My gut has never trusted him either.
Always trust your gut. It will never fail you.
100%. It also gave me a big fat "No!" on crypto...
Me too!
twitter always sucked, which is why i never went on it.
Musk might have good intentions. Do you think he could implement them if he did?
Do you really think he could?
I originally, reluctantly joined Twitter in 2014 when I was helping to support a campaign to bring awareness to one of the survivors, a whistleblower regarding rampant sexual abuse in one of the many children's homes in the UK. It can be effective for things like that. I don't post very often on Twitter, not even my Substack blogs but promote others on there. I also find that it can be quite helpful sometimes when doing research.
As I have expressed in this post and others, I do not feel that Musk has good intentions. He is a very useful puppet for the dark cabal.
The short answer in my opinion: No. (But maybe we will be delightfully surprised?) I've learned in my life to *never* trust anyone (especially a public figure) until I'm shown good fruit produced from the branches of their tree. And even then, I stay leery and suspicious because *all* human beings can be corrupted and stray down a dark path no matter how altruistic, benevolent, sincere and "good" they may seem on the surface.
I sadly agree with you that most, if not all human beings have their weaknesses that lend us to potentially being corruptible.