It was featured in the movie Planet of the Humans. I wouldn't call them greenwashed, they're just woke. In my personal experience they have about as much environmental focus as the worst polluters on the planet. They're more interested in what gender you identify as. There was a lot of truth in Moore & Gibson's movie although they did hint at population reduction. So maybe that's why the woke climate warriors didn't like it and more or less got it banned. As they didn't want us to figure that one out before 2020.
It's probably pretty debatable whether those big wind turbines have a long term beneficial impact as far as fewer fossil fuels in manufacture, transportation, installing, upkeep, running.
Might be better to put a whole bunch of wheels in a running river.
Thanks shall have a look. I also saw a paper on it years ago regarding moving the UK to 'clean energy' and it seemed an impossible task. May not be elsewhere though and I've still got a neutral attitude to it.
I refer to the woke ones who are brainwashed by the propaganda and lies of the climate change agenda, including that not clean nor green intermittent unreliable "renewables" will allegedly save the planet™️ as greenwashed ones.
I have looked into this in the past and was just putting some research together in case other people may be interested, especially given the amount of attention that the lightening strike and fire of the Crowell, Texas turbine caused.
"Do the greenwashed ones know this?"
It was featured in the movie Planet of the Humans. I wouldn't call them greenwashed, they're just woke. In my personal experience they have about as much environmental focus as the worst polluters on the planet. They're more interested in what gender you identify as. There was a lot of truth in Moore & Gibson's movie although they did hint at population reduction. So maybe that's why the woke climate warriors didn't like it and more or less got it banned. As they didn't want us to figure that one out before 2020.
It's probably pretty debatable whether those big wind turbines have a long term beneficial impact as far as fewer fossil fuels in manufacture, transportation, installing, upkeep, running.
Might be better to put a whole bunch of wheels in a running river.
The short answer is that they don't.
I compiled some information about the desecration and destruction the not clean nor green bird, bat and insect killing monsters cause in this piece: https://azradale.substack.com/p/more-net-zero-insanity
See also: 'The Reason Renewables Can't Power Modern Civilization Is Because They Were Never Meant To' by Michael Shellenberger https://azradale.substack.com/p/the-reason-renewables-cant-power
Thanks shall have a look. I also saw a paper on it years ago regarding moving the UK to 'clean energy' and it seemed an impossible task. May not be elsewhere though and I've still got a neutral attitude to it.
TBH that looks more like a propaganda piece designed with the help of some org such as WEF.
Because it was. I blocked the creep who has shown up again on a recent post of mine. I must go find it so I can block it/him again.
I refer to the woke ones who are brainwashed by the propaganda and lies of the climate change agenda, including that not clean nor green intermittent unreliable "renewables" will allegedly save the planet™️ as greenwashed ones.
No. Not at all.
I have looked into this in the past and was just putting some research together in case other people may be interested, especially given the amount of attention that the lightening strike and fire of the Crowell, Texas turbine caused.