Western media report indignantly about an alleged Russian attack on a maternity clinic in Mariupol. However, the "victims" are actors, as anyone can easily verify.
What Karen is trying to point out to you Harry is, if you look closely at the eyebrows in all the photos of these “different” women, they all are the same colour (without any residue from being within the blast zone, that caused shrapnel injuries “evidenced by” blood on the facial area), they all have the same thickness, and curvature shape!! The last detail is the most telling.
From a body language perspective, the eyebrows are very indicative of emotions being experienced by the observed individual. All three scenes presented different degrees of trauma which should have presented different emotional responses from the individuals (unless they where all under the influence of pain medication ie morphine, which they/she was not).
The first image of walking down the stairs just minutes after experiencing a direct hit from a missile (close enough to suffer shrapnel injuries) would elicit a heightened state of awareness and self preservation, usually expressed by raised eyebrows (with a middle of each eyebrow peak) and slightly bulged/protruding eyeballs! Remember she is also negotiating a damaged and debris strewn stairway whilst heavily pregnant, unsure if there will be another missile strike or if the building would collapse which alone would have elicited a concentrative effort/urgency expression, but nothing!? Please note that the video is more revealing regarding collective body language markers/clusters.
In the second photo of the woman on the stretcher, the eyebrows (and eyes) are indicative of a fairly relaxed individual (not under the influence of pain medication), with the same colour, shape and expression as the first photo of the “different woman”!? Additionally, this women on the stretcher had supposedly suffered injuries which later she, and her unborn did not survive, according to the unnamed, non interviewed doctor/surgeon whom attempted to save them both (widely broadcast from many other western news sources). If there has been a name or interview given, please advise and link!
I have seen the non blurred video of this “rescue” and there are several inconsistencies that do not match with my study and experience relating to mechanisms of injury, and the resulting physical trauma and bodies reaction to that trauma.
An injury to the pelvis that leads to the loss of an unborn child and the mother, would be severely debilitating, and extremely painful. Even without any movement (let alone the bumps and rolls of being stretchered out over rough debris strewn terrain) it would have elicited severe pain for the victim, (if they were even conscious) expressed as grimacing on her face, with every movement of her body. On the video it can be seen that she is calm and relaxed as she is stretchered out. She even has enough conscious control over her “severe injuries” and the “resulting pain” to be able to acknowledge the camera and focus her vision towards it. No, she was not given adequate pain relief for that type of injury, otherwise she surely could not have calmly focused on the camera! If you don’t think this is correct, view some footage of victims whom have, and have not been given pain medication! They will definitely not exhibit the calm, non expressive, and focussed concentration evident on this “life threatening injured” woman’s face.
Anyone whom has experienced a severe injury which hinders or prevents self extraction (evacuation without assistance) knows that the pain kicks quickly after the adrenaline dissipates! You will be grimacing, breathing heavily/quickly and possibly screaming or unconscious!! If you have been given pain medication you will be visibly disoriented and non focused with your attention and actions. Just think of the visible effects of alcohol or drugs!
The third photo shows “another” woman waiting outside the damaged hospital whom has the same eyebrow colour, shape/curvature as all depicted “different” women, including the model in the social media post, again with no evidence of emotional trauma in any normal body language response that would seem appropriate for the situation. Now some observers would explain this by saying she was traumatised by the event, maybe even shell shocked and disorientated? Why would she be left on her own in the middle of the courtyard that has just been struck with a missile, unsure if there was going to be another. It is well known that in a militant (terrorist) initiated strike on civilian infrastructure, there is a real danger of follow up strikes to claim further civilian victims as first responders attend to casualties. I would not be hanging around so close to the strike point if I didn’t need to unless I was a first responder or a journalist documenting the events, certainly not a walking wounded self extractee!
However this is not the most perplexing detail in this third photo of the incident! In the scene of the devastated hospital courtyard, where most of the ground is strewn with the debris from the bomb blast, there is what appears to be a cooking grill (lower left behind injured women) supported by stones with a large pot of steaming something and a water boiling receptacle!?! Did this courtyard, only minutes before, receive a strike that was so powerful it blew out windows, caused items and people inside to be flung about causing life threatening injuries? I am not doubting the strike happened, or even the damage to the building but, how did this cooking structure (presumably placed without any mechanical fixing into the ground or between rocks and the grill) survive intact.....with a pot of steaming something in it!!!! Anyone who has done any cooking knows how long it takes to boil water, let alone setup a cook grill and light a fire sufficient to boil water with this heating arrangement, or cook something! Certainly more than a few minutes? Perhaps to supply hot food and drinks for the production crew.......sorry........ journalists on the scene!
Please, have a good look, do some research, gather evidence.....fact check me!!
I had heard that Ukraine had previously removed the pregnant women and installed their troops inside.
Possibly the Azov battalion.
The PR effect was massive.
Every single UK newspaper was showing the same story yesterday, so if it's a lie, or a distortion of the truth, then it must be loudly exposed as such.
We must still be very careful not to be creative with facts or ignore the obvious though.
It clearly isn't the same woman and the opposition will use that statement to undermine all other arguments we have.
With 90% of the wilfully blind sheep believing the narrative being spun, we must be absolutely certain of our facts, so they cannot be dismantled by woke fools and the permanently offended.
What Karen is trying to point out to you Harry is, if you look closely at the eyebrows in all the photos of these “different” women, they all are the same colour (without any residue from being within the blast zone, that caused shrapnel injuries “evidenced by” blood on the facial area), they all have the same thickness, and curvature shape!! The last detail is the most telling.
From a body language perspective, the eyebrows are very indicative of emotions being experienced by the observed individual. All three scenes presented different degrees of trauma which should have presented different emotional responses from the individuals (unless they where all under the influence of pain medication ie morphine, which they/she was not).
The first image of walking down the stairs just minutes after experiencing a direct hit from a missile (close enough to suffer shrapnel injuries) would elicit a heightened state of awareness and self preservation, usually expressed by raised eyebrows (with a middle of each eyebrow peak) and slightly bulged/protruding eyeballs! Remember she is also negotiating a damaged and debris strewn stairway whilst heavily pregnant, unsure if there will be another missile strike or if the building would collapse which alone would have elicited a concentrative effort/urgency expression, but nothing!? Please note that the video is more revealing regarding collective body language markers/clusters.
In the second photo of the woman on the stretcher, the eyebrows (and eyes) are indicative of a fairly relaxed individual (not under the influence of pain medication), with the same colour, shape and expression as the first photo of the “different woman”!? Additionally, this women on the stretcher had supposedly suffered injuries which later she, and her unborn did not survive, according to the unnamed, non interviewed doctor/surgeon whom attempted to save them both (widely broadcast from many other western news sources). If there has been a name or interview given, please advise and link!
I have seen the non blurred video of this “rescue” and there are several inconsistencies that do not match with my study and experience relating to mechanisms of injury, and the resulting physical trauma and bodies reaction to that trauma.
An injury to the pelvis that leads to the loss of an unborn child and the mother, would be severely debilitating, and extremely painful. Even without any movement (let alone the bumps and rolls of being stretchered out over rough debris strewn terrain) it would have elicited severe pain for the victim, (if they were even conscious) expressed as grimacing on her face, with every movement of her body. On the video it can be seen that she is calm and relaxed as she is stretchered out. She even has enough conscious control over her “severe injuries” and the “resulting pain” to be able to acknowledge the camera and focus her vision towards it. No, she was not given adequate pain relief for that type of injury, otherwise she surely could not have calmly focused on the camera! If you don’t think this is correct, view some footage of victims whom have, and have not been given pain medication! They will definitely not exhibit the calm, non expressive, and focussed concentration evident on this “life threatening injured” woman’s face.
Anyone whom has experienced a severe injury which hinders or prevents self extraction (evacuation without assistance) knows that the pain kicks quickly after the adrenaline dissipates! You will be grimacing, breathing heavily/quickly and possibly screaming or unconscious!! If you have been given pain medication you will be visibly disoriented and non focused with your attention and actions. Just think of the visible effects of alcohol or drugs!
The third photo shows “another” woman waiting outside the damaged hospital whom has the same eyebrow colour, shape/curvature as all depicted “different” women, including the model in the social media post, again with no evidence of emotional trauma in any normal body language response that would seem appropriate for the situation. Now some observers would explain this by saying she was traumatised by the event, maybe even shell shocked and disorientated? Why would she be left on her own in the middle of the courtyard that has just been struck with a missile, unsure if there was going to be another. It is well known that in a militant (terrorist) initiated strike on civilian infrastructure, there is a real danger of follow up strikes to claim further civilian victims as first responders attend to casualties. I would not be hanging around so close to the strike point if I didn’t need to unless I was a first responder or a journalist documenting the events, certainly not a walking wounded self extractee!
However this is not the most perplexing detail in this third photo of the incident! In the scene of the devastated hospital courtyard, where most of the ground is strewn with the debris from the bomb blast, there is what appears to be a cooking grill (lower left behind injured women) supported by stones with a large pot of steaming something and a water boiling receptacle!?! Did this courtyard, only minutes before, receive a strike that was so powerful it blew out windows, caused items and people inside to be flung about causing life threatening injuries? I am not doubting the strike happened, or even the damage to the building but, how did this cooking structure (presumably placed without any mechanical fixing into the ground or between rocks and the grill) survive intact.....with a pot of steaming something in it!!!! Anyone who has done any cooking knows how long it takes to boil water, let alone setup a cook grill and light a fire sufficient to boil water with this heating arrangement, or cook something! Certainly more than a few minutes? Perhaps to supply hot food and drinks for the production crew.......sorry........ journalists on the scene!
Please, have a good look, do some research, gather evidence.....fact check me!!
I'm sure that the woman on the stairs and the woman on the stretcher are not the same.
The well groomed eyebrows are so free of toxic dust, which is a narrow escape wouldn't you say Harry?
I had heard that Ukraine had previously removed the pregnant women and installed their troops inside.
Possibly the Azov battalion.
The PR effect was massive.
Every single UK newspaper was showing the same story yesterday, so if it's a lie, or a distortion of the truth, then it must be loudly exposed as such.
We must still be very careful not to be creative with facts or ignore the obvious though.
It clearly isn't the same woman and the opposition will use that statement to undermine all other arguments we have.
With 90% of the wilfully blind sheep believing the narrative being spun, we must be absolutely certain of our facts, so they cannot be dismantled by woke fools and the permanently offended.