I highly recommend watching the Electronic Intifada’s livestream from Thursday, January 16th during which they discussed many important issues relating to Gaza and Israel especially the Ceasefire of course.
The information Jon Elmer provided regarding the efficacy of the Palestinian Resistance vs. the IDF was outstanding.
Ali Abunimah made an impassioned statement at the end which reflected his recent article published by the Electronic Intifada which I have reproduced below.
The prime minister of Qatar announced late Wednesday that a phased deal had been reached between Israel and Hamas to end more than 460 days of brutal and devastating war and genocide in Gaza and to exchange prisoners.
The news was met with joy in Gaza, but fear and apprehension remain. The ceasefire is not set to come into effect until Sunday, and Israel has not let up its bombing and massacres. And while the agreement is expected to bring immediate relief to Palestinians, many questions remain unanswered about a devastated Gaza’s long-term future.
While many factors led to this agreement, especially the continued strength of the resistance on the ground, the intervention of Donald Trump appears to have been decisive.
The US president-elect’s envoy is reported to have applied unprecedented pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, something the Biden administration has adamantly refused to do.
We’ll speak to Ahmed Alnaouq, co-founder and director of We Are Not Numbers, who lost 21 close relatives in this genocide.
We’ll also be joined by political and economic analyst Shir Hever for an update on what is happening within Israeli society and the growing global arms embargo against the genocidal state.
Nora Barrows-Friedman will start the program with a news roundup and Jon Elmer will cover all the latest resistance news from the ongoing battle in northern Gaza.
Join Nora, Jon, Ali Abunimah, Tamara Nassar and Asa Winstanley to discuss all this and more.
Thank you for reading, listening to and sharing all our original news and analysis at The Electronic Intifada.
We're an independent publication. Our work is only possible thanks to supporters like you. Please make a gift so we can keep exposing Israel's lies and telling Palestine's stories.
The following is a reposting of Ali Abunimah’s article as published on The Electronic Intifada website, January 15, 2025 which he referenced during EI’s Livestream excellent livestream linked above.
Ali Abunimah • January 15, 2025 • Electronic Intifada
As of Wednesday morning in Palestine, hopes remained high that a deal to end the Israeli genocide in Gaza and free Palestinian and Israeli captives was imminent.
Negotiators in Doha were reportedly ironing out the final details on an agreement that would bring a reprieve to a population that has endured more than 15 months of relentless Israeli bombing and starvation amid unspeakable atrocities, killing at least tens of thousands and upending the lives of millions.
If agreed and implemented, the deal will also represent a major strategic defeat for Israel.
The outlines of the deal – as reported in the media – are for a three-phase process based on the framework laid out by US President Joe Biden in May and accepted by Hamas.
It would see an immediate ceasefire, a massive inflow of humanitarian aid and a staged Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, accompanied by prisoner exchanges over the course of multiple weeks.
A key question I discussed with journalist Rania Khalek on her BreakThrough News program Dispatches on Tuesday is why the same deal that went nowhere last year is now apparently on the brink of being sealed.
In a wide-ranging discussion we also talked about the downfall of Syria’s government, the future of the Axis of Resistance and much more. You can watch the whole discussion in the video above.
The resistance is still strong
As I told Khalek, the two key factors are the strength of the resistance and Donald Trump, who returns to the White House as US president in less than a week.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, Trump has been putting extraordinary pressure on Israel of a kind that is shocking Tel Aviv and that the Biden administration has absolutely refused to apply.
After 15 months, Palestinian resistance fighters are still attacking Israeli occupation forces in every part of Gaza where they are present, including in the far northern areas that Israel entered and supposedly gained control of in the earliest weeks of its invasion.
The heavy losses and constant attrition have for months been sapping the ability and morale of the Israeli army to carry on a futile effort to defeat a resistance that moves through an extensive tunnel system that remains largely intact.
In light of this, a clear majority of Israelis now support a comprehensive deal to end the war, not merely a temporary pause until whatever captives have survived Israel’s indiscriminate bombing come home. That’s a sea-change in an Israeli public whose lust for revenge against Palestinians in Gaza for the 7 October 2023 resistance operation had seemed insatiable.
Where the power really lies
The other key factor is Trump’s intervention. Last week, the president-elect sent his Middle East envoy to read Israel the riot act.
In a symbolic playing out of the real power relations between Israel and the United States, Steve Witkoff informed the office of Benjamin Netanyahu last Friday that he’d be arriving in Israel the next day and wanted to meet him.
Netanyahu’s aides “politely explained that was in the middle of the Sabbath but that the prime minister would gladly meet him Saturday night,” according to Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
“Witkoff’s blunt reaction took them by surprise,” Haaretz added. “He explained to them in salty English that Shabbat was of no interest to him. His message was loud and clear.”
Netanyahu obeyed orders from Trump’s envoy and showed up at his office as commanded “for an official meeting with Witkoff, who then returned to Qatar to seal the deal.”
The result of that meeting, according to Haaretz, is that “Witkoff has forced Israel to accept a plan that Netanyahu had repeatedly rejected over the past half year,” making serious concessions to a Hamas that has not budged from its position that the release of Israeli captives must be conditioned on the release of Palestinian prisoners, an end to the war and a complete – albeit phased – Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.
This one act could shatter the myth that the Israel lobby holds decisive sway over the US government.
A strategic defeat
How would this represent a strategic defeat for Israel and in effect a victory for the Palestinian resistance in the face of the horrific and still not fully known toll of Israel’s ongoing genocide?
Simply put, Israel will have utterly failed to achieve the “total victory” Netanyahu repeatedly vowed.
“The war in Gaza could end tomorrow if Hamas surrenders, disarms and returns all the hostages,” Netanyahu told the US Congress in June. “But if they don’t, Israel will fight until we destroy Hamas’ military capabilities and its rule in Gaza and bring all our hostages home.”
“That’s what total victory means, and we will settle for nothing less,” the prime minister added.
If this deal goes ahead, Israel will have achieved none of those goals: Hamas will not have been destroyed or disarmed. It will still remain in de facto control inside Gaza – whatever post-war arrangements are put in place – and Israel will have failed to impose its will on a tiny besieged territory after almost 500 days of genocidal extermination and unprecedented mass destruction.
Israel’s barely hidden desires to ethnically cleanse the population of Gaza and resettle it with Jewish colonists will have been defeated.
Israel, moreover, will not return to the place it once held in the world. More than ever it will be a despised pariah whose leaders and soldiers are fugitive war criminals unable to freely travel the globe.
Unexpected pressure
“The pressure Trump is exerting right now is not the kind that Israel expected from him. The pressure is the essence of the matter,” one Netanyahu surrogate said recently.
Everyone, especially Israeli leaders, appear surprised that Trump – who was as staunchly pro-Israel as could be in his first term – would be putting any pressure at all on Netanyahu.
During the US election campaign, Trump had talked of letting Israel “finish the job” in Gaza – red meat for his base and for Israel’s government.
As this writer noted, an intriguing indication that something else was afoot was Trump’s posting on social media earlier this month of a video highly critical of Netanyahu.
In the video, Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs accuses Netanyahu of dragging the United States into the war in Iraq, trying to instigate a US war with Iran and calling the Israeli leader a “deep, dark son of a bitch.”
It was a sign that – unlike Biden’s – Trump’s unconditional support could not be taken for granted.
But there were earlier signs: In July, even before the US election, Trump told Netanyahu that he wanted the war in Gaza to end before Trump would return to office.
Witkoff, Trump’s envoy, has reportedly been firm and consistent about that deadline.
And in the closing stages of the campaign, Trump courted traditionally predominantly Democratic voters disgusted by the Biden-Harris administration’s implacable support for the genocide.
“The Muslim and Arab voters in Michigan and across the country want a stop to the endless wars and a return to peace in the Middle East. That’s all they want,” Trump told a rally in Michigan, which he ended up winning along with every other swing state.
What are Trump’s motivations?
As Khalek and this writer discussed, it is not necessary to view Trump as having any sort of sympathy with the Palestinian struggle to understand what might be behind his surprising willingness to pressure Israel now.
While Trump is often unpredictable and mercurial, a consistent aspect of his worldview is that he does not view America’s traditional “allies” as anything more than client states who are taking advantage of American largesse.
He appears to have no sentimental attachment to them, nor does he see them as vital to his “America First” agenda.
This was his view of NATO in his first term, when he accused Germany, supposedly the bedrock of the transatlantic security alliance, of “making a fortune” off US troops stationed in the country.
Demanding billions from ostensible allies and partners, he thundered, “Why should we defend countries and not be reimbursed?”
He’s even turned on Canada, the largest US trading partner, saying the US is being exploited and does not need Canada’s goods.
He’s even called for the US to absorb Canada as its 51st state.
Given Trump’s disdain for countries that have long been revered as – albeit subordinate – partners by the transatlantic ruling classes, the question is why would he treat Israel any differently?
This is especially the case when Israel has long been the biggest recipient of American largesse.
At the very least, Trump seems likely to take the approach that with America paying Israel’s bills, America will give the orders.
While the Gaza deal is not yet done, the progress made in a few days with Trump’s intervention underscores that Washington giving the orders is and has always been the true nature of the US-Israel relationship.
These developments expose without a shadow of a doubt that the Biden administration’s failure to achieve a ceasefire was always wilful, and that the Democratic Party government positively chose to arm and support the genocide.
There will have to be accountability for that.
What Trump’s bigger plans are for the region remain to be seen.
She has denied reports that she conditioned her $100 million gift on Trump’s support for Israeli annexation of the occupied West Bank.
But there’s no doubt that she and other elements of Trump’s base will be pushing for and using their positions near and within the administration to implement extreme anti-Palestinian measures, including even more domestic repression of the Palestine solidarity movement, something Trump himself has promised.
And no one should be surprised if and when Trump delivers.
But Trump is returning as president of a United States that is significantly weaker in relative terms than when he first took office, given the continued rise of China, Russia and new multipolar formations such as BRICS.
The United States may no longer be able to unilaterally impose its will on the whole world, but it can impose its will on Israel, its tiny genocidal dependency in Southwest Asia.
For the sake of the Palestinian people in Gaza, let’s hope the pressure from Trump brings an end to the horrific bloodshed as quickly as possible.
Why is Trump pressuring Israel to ........?
Because the script calls for the Remus rebuilding part of the Romulus and Remus protocol.