Who is Elon Musk?
I agree with the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World’s evaluation of the deep state’s puppet that is slimy Elon Musk. Most everything about him is fabricated.
I recommend watching the video they included which provides a good brief overview: Elon Musk Exposed.
Who is Elon Musk?
By 2nd Smartest Guy in the World • May 6, 2022
Without getting into the fraud that is Tesla and the fact that each car is a net loss without some kind of ZEV credit, carbon credit and taxpayer theft government handout, and that each car over its lifetime produces far more CO2 (a good thing) and far more pollution (a bad thing) than any ICE vehicle, not to mention all the blatant accounting fraud, or the fact that Space-X is nothing more than 1990’s rehashed NASA tech (taxpayer funded), or that Elon is a CIA puppet that is using Twitter to merely herd conservatives back into a platform that is rapidly losing market share to competing social media like Gettr under the guise of “free speech", etc. etc. etc.
Here is a notable pic of the fraudster and his Communist loving creepazoid ex:
And here is a MUST SEE brief video expose on the Elon fraudster boy Musk:
Do NOT comply.
(Hat tip to Barry O'Kenyan for photo.)
PS Grimes in the very early stages of her career was exceptionally talented, but as an adult she is completely indoctrinated in radical left Death Cultism; to wit:
These are my comments and additional information regarding Elon Musk whom in my opinion for many years now, is the epitome of controlled opposition.
For what it’s worth, take a look at the lyrics for Sagrad Прекрасныйto in the Grimes video above.
What kind of ‘people’ would name their son “X Æ A-12, which she pronounces “X A.I. Archangel,” or X for short”? I guess the same kind that would name their daughter (by surrogate) Y whose full name is Exa Dark Sideræl Musk. See: “Infamy Is Kind Of Fun”: Grimes on Music, Mars, and Her Secret New Baby With Elon Musk by Vanity Fair, April 2022 issue.
Musk apparently has 10 children and “quietly welcomed twins with Neuralink director of operations and special projects Shivon Zilis in November 2021, according to court documents obtained by Business Insider in July 2022.” Source
His seeming desire to reproduce lots of little Musks reminds me of Epstein’s plans to “seed the human race with his DNA.”
It may not be a leap at all to speculate about this given Whitney Webb’s research that, “Epstein claimed to be advising Tesla and Elon Musk, who had been previously photographed with Epstein’s alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell.”
Musk is himself also interested in human DNA.
In the early 2000s, scientists from the Human Genome Project announced a breakthrough: they had sequenced the complete human reference genome, including all three billion DNA letter, a scientific undertaking likened at the time to landing astronauts on the Moon.
While the reference genome has come under question as of late, with scientists adding more than two million additional variants, it still doesn't take a whole lot of space to store the entire sequence on a traditional computer.
And now, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is once again weighing in on an issue outside his expertise, arguing that one could "fit the DNA sequences of all humans alive today in a fairly small data storage system" — a vaguely terrifying thought coming from the richest man in the world, as if he didn't already have enough fires to put out and problems to solve.
According to MIT Technology Review senior editor Antonio Regalado, who engaged with Musk over the question, the storage size of a single human genome could end up being in the neighborhood of 100 gigabytes.
Dogecoin co-creator Billy Markin, one of Musk's closest Twitter pen pals, immediately pointed out the potentially hair-raising implications of holding all of humanity's DNA sequences in a small room.
"And it'll be used for good, right?" Natalie Portman's Padmé Amidala from "Star Wars Episode II" asks in a meme posted by Markin. "And it'll be used for good, right?" she repeats, looking chagrined.
At least, that's one interpretation of Musk's comment. The billionaire CEO could also be simply pointing out how surprisingly small the cumulative data of all humans' DNA could turn out to be given the vast commonalities between them.
"One could simply have a few reference human genomes and simply code each individual with a lossless compression delta!" Musk mused.
In simpler terms, why store common DNA information twice if one could reference the data shared by multiple human genomes?
Sure, it's an eyebrow-raising comment from the likes of Musk. Collecting the DNA sequences of all living humans walking this Earth in one place could end in a disaster of unperceivable proportions if that data were to ever land in the wrong hands or be used for nefarious purposes.
But we'll have to err on the side of caution and assume that Musk was just thinking out loud.
We'd certainly be better off if not.
Which reminds me, the whole Musk and Twitter thing in my opinion is yet another psyop to manipulate people’s minds into “trusting” Musk as the “good guy” when he is absolutely not. I feel that it’s about data mining increased personal information as they manipulate more minds to accept the dark technocratic agenda of control.
After all, it is the satellite system, including Starlink which will create the global surveillance and data mining control grid.
Speaking of Musk as the alleged “good guy”…
This is an excerpt from SpaceX President Defends Elon Musk Against Sexual Misconduct Claims published 24 May 2022:
"Personally, I believe the allegations to be false," Shotwell wrote in a company-wide email, "not because I work for Elon, but because I have worked closely with him for 20 years and never seen nor heard anything resembling these allegations."
In an Insider exposé last week, an unnamed woman who was friends with the flight attendant shared documents with the website about the harassment that allegedly took place in 2016. Though the flight attendant allegedly signed a nondisclosure agreement in 2018 in exchange for the purported $250,000 payout from SpaceX, the friend did not.
Shotwell, notably, neither confirmed nor denied the $250,000 payment in the email.
According to Insider, the flight attendant was giving Musk a massage on a private SpaceX jet in 2016 when he exposed his erect penis to her, touched her without her consent, and told her he'd "buy her a horse" — an apparent reference to the woman's equestrian hobby — if she "did more." She refused, the friend said, and later had her shifts cut back in what she believed was retaliation for rebuffing the CEO's advances.
In 2018, the woman brought a sexual misconduct suit against Musk and SpaceX, which was, per Insider's reporting, settled out of court for $250,000 and an NDA. The flight attendant's friend signed a sworn declaration about the incident that the website also obtained.
In her email to SpaceX employees, Shotwell said that she "will never comment on any legal matters involving employment issues" and noted that Musk has also denied the allegations from the flight attendant, whose name has also not been released to the public. In response to Insider, Musk said the flight attendant's allegations are part of a "politically motivated hit piece," and on Twitter called the woman's friend a "liar."
"If I were inclined to engage in sexual harassment," Musk told the website, "this is unlikely to be the first time in my entire 30-year career that it comes to light."
It should be noted, however, that although this is the first accusation leveled against the SpaceX CEO himself, his companies have been known for their own sexual misconduct scandals.
If he didn’t do anything wrong, why did Musk, his handlers pay the woman $250,000?
Related posts: