(2,800 words or about 14 minutes of your company).
The Triumph of Death, Giacomo Borlone, 1485
Apr 13, 2024
Research has already established a genetically-modified third hand... flapping beside, on the left, links between the blackmail-extortion-finance racket that was Maxwell-Epstein and, on the other hand, research into mRNA and nano particles in the top universities.
Those who own and control television, news outlets and large-reach publications (including the science journals) are strands of the same apparatus that facilitates, directs and disguises such research.
Investigations continue to reveal blackmail rings, from Maxwell-Epstein to P-Diddy, following from Roy Cohn and J Edgar Hoover. No-one can say why or how they achieved their purpose or what was the object or result of their efforts.
Microscopy continues to reveal strange structural formations in the blood after the mass roll-out of the Covid shot. No-one can say why or how, or by whom they were disseminated, or what is their purpose — though we are seeing the effects.
The mechanisms have been exposed. The objective is as yet unclear.
TL;DR
There is a lively debate over the possibility of the Covid injectable being contaminated, by design, by sloppiness or not at all.
There is, at the very least, a wide variation in side effects between batches. Some researchers imply that lots were varied for “in vivo” testing - former president Barack Obama said: "We've essentially clinically tested the vaccine on billions of people worldwide."
Others concede there was contamination, but imply it was not deliberate. When reports first emerged of researchers claiming to see nano fragments in 2021, a Reuters fact check said they were contamination by dust particles and fibres.
In Oct 2023 evidence emerged that the mRNA injectable approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Association — even under emergency use authorisation — could not be manufactured at scale and was replaced with a "dirty" formula that was not the one given emergency use authorization. This contained “plasmoid DNA” fragments. The version called Cominarty which received FDA approval in Aug 2022, was never manufactured at scale.
Phillip Buckhaults, a cancer genomics expert, and professor at the University of South Carolina has testified before a South Carolina Senate medical affairs ad-hoc committee about contamination of the Covid injectables with DNA fragments. Here is a quote of the FDA’s response.
The word used by Dr Peter McCullough for the shot is a “military countermeasure.” The injection’s development by the Pentagon and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has been traced through patents, contracts and grants by Dr David Martin, Katherine Watt, Sasha Latypova and others.
Bio-digital fusion
Micro implantables or lipid nanoparticles (LNP) are central to the merger of man and machine.
You may consider this to be the stuff of science fiction but Yuval Harari and Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum talk about it all the time: "The fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological identities.” as the latter puts it.
Pay attention to the words. He does not say "merge," in which physical and digital identity may overlap, but "fuse". And why not say the physical body, if that’s what he means, but specifically your "biological” identity?
Subscribed
Desire or intent
Perhaps they are psychotic: Harari and Schwab hardly help the image.
The researcher Dr. David Nixon told Christopher James on the podcast “A Warrior Calls”:
“The (the WEF) make these really confident claims about how we are all hackable animals, and how we are going to own nothing and be happy. We’re going to build back better and so forth.
Where does that confidence come from? It either comes from being completely psychotic, which is clearly part of it, or these people know something that we don’t. And I am concerned that this is part of what they know that we don’t; and we need to understand this fast.” [1]
Telly time!
Na-nu, na-nu
Nanotech research is at least 60 years old - a couple of decades before the 1978 US television show Mork & Mindy. American physicist and Nobel Prize laureate Richard Feynman introduced the concept of nanotechnology in 1959. Blackmail, on the third hand, is as old as the hills.
Klaus Schwab, co-founder of the World Economic Forum has spoken of implantable circuitry that would allow people to communicate like Mork.
If a “conspiracy theorist” listens to those who promote themselves as “thought leaders” then we can say, in some cases, such people are one and the same.
Families, tribes, networks
If we don't talk about the Epstein-mRNA/ DNA science link, it's not for lack of knowledge.
We can even see overlaps between this military, pharma, big tech media operation: the Maxwell family has a long history in scientific publication and the promotion of particular scientists. It was Ghislaine's father Robert who first held glamorous parties to promote scientists as celebrities.
Robert (born Ján Ludvík Hoch) made his money as a media proprietor (most notably Pergamon Press, originally Butterworth and controlled by Western intelligence, and later the Daily Mirror). As a spy he was involved in the transfer of Promis surveillance software and the arrest of nuclear scientist Mordechai Vanunu.
Epstein's focus was also scientists, especially in nanotech and gene manipulation — as misdirection he spoke almost ludicrously of wanting to father his own race of children. [2]
An island, off limits
The legacy media won't go there. Much of the mainstream alternative media is equally allergic to what may wash up on the beach. This reveals a third strand to our quest: ownership and control of the media.
One reason the international press shy away from these connections is the incestuous and dynastic nature of politics today. The press talks of nepo babes in the entertainment industry but it is equally a feature of politics.
U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken's step-father Samuel Pisar was Robert Maxwell's long time lawyer and consigliere He's not the only one. Blinken's predecessor William Barr, who is a former CIA chief, is the son of the man who gave Epstein his first job - as an unqualified maths teacher at the Dalton School.
Avoiding embarrassment to those in power may not be the reason.
NLP, LNP
Neuro linguistic programming may ensure a gushing response in the press to the concept of lipid nanoparticles. Yet with the release of mRNA shots the toxicity of lipid nanoparticles (LNP) attracted attention.
It is only now that LNP-mRNA is being identified as something that causes hypersensitivity reactions, or HSRs, which can manifest as anaphylaxis, myocarditis, throat swelling, respiratory failure and haemodynamic changes or alterations to the blood visible under the microscope.
Some blame the spike protein, others say the component that creates most adverse reaction is PEGylated lipid within LNP-mRNA.
The journal Nature published a study whose abstract begins by heaping praise on mRNA's "transformative technology" before weaselling in the main finding: "avoiding unacceptable toxicity with mRNA drugs and vaccines presents challenges." [3]
Scientists know they must tread carefully when challenging research that has been canonized as government policy, consecrated by state funding, and sanctified as Da Science.
The Nature study is behind a paywall, not fully obscured, but why hidden at all?
The WEF may seem like a forum for futurists and dreamers but it brings together the world's most powerful corporations, and it serves as a training ground for politicians, the "Young Global Leaders" (founded in 1992 as “Global Leaders for Tomorrow”).
Thus corporations and politicians are joined at the hip with bureaucrats and the institutions of international government.
In 2019 it joined up with the United Nations as the "UN-Forum Partnership" to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which they renewed in 2023 with the objective of "catalysing" the Net Zero carbon and climate agendas by 2025.
The agreement in 2019 focused on six policies: financing the 2030 Agenda, Climate Change, health, digital cooperation, gender equality and empowerment of women, education and skills.
The initial four goals are concrete — SMART cities, Net Zero, the decade of vaccines and digital ID — but the final three provide the cover story and the emotional impulse or dysphoria.
Distractions and dead ends
We must weigh news not only according to what the media says but by what it denies, and how strongly.
Any discussion of health measures immediately attracts the Fakt Cheka like flies on the proverbial.
Are these even health measures? Covid was a massive response by bureaucrats worldwide, often bypassing leaders and legislatures, who mouthed the identical words, “reset and build back better.”
They locked down society, distanced and quarantined the healthy, censored protestors, using police to brutalise dissenters, and mandated shots for many professions – for a coronavirus or relative of the common cold.
Fundamental freedoms were violated — association, thought, conscience, religion, movement — but the United Nations long ago redefined our rights to marginalise those freedoms, so that bureaucrats could claim they were defending them while trampling them! See the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.
The fundamental challenge is that freedoms absolute under God (or any moral order, “if you can keep it,” as Benjamin Franklin said) are replaced with liberties at the expense of another human, or in common parlance “under the Earth.”
The two can coexist but they have been turned into opposites by the political trick of polarisation.
Read the media upside down: pay attention to what it censors by omission — what it does not tell you — using, as a clue, what the fact checkers deny.
Microchips in vaccines was an early straw man, distracting attention from the technology involved.
Fakt Cheka and their lies
The fact checks have not aged well but note also how they evolved:
"COVID-19 vaccines aren’t experimental and don’t track humans" – Politifact, Dec 2020
“Vaccine rumours debunked: Microchips, 'altered DNA' and more” - BBC, Dec 2020
"No, there is not a chip placed inside the coronavirus vaccine" – Poynter, Mar 2021
“COVID-19 vaccine microchip and magnet claims don’t stick” – Australian AP, May 2021
“World Economic Forum Did NOT State CBDC Chips Must Be 'Implanted Under Your Skin'” – Lead Stories, Jul 2023
“No, COVID vaccines don’t contain nanotechnology that can be programmed via 5G wireless networks” – AP, Jul 2023
Former WEF global leader for tomorrow, the economist prof Richard Werner says that a chip implant of some sort will be linked to central bank digital currencies (CBDC). The author of the widely acclaimed book and documentary “Princes Of The Yen” says a central banker told him an implantable chip is indeed the objective.
An RFID chip in the hand is already being tested in Scandinavia and has nothing to do with lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines. It is a completely different technology and application. [4]
Conflation, miscalibration
Several issues are at stake, and we must take care not to conflate them (the following has no order of importance)":
A new monetary system based on carbon tracking and personal allowances;
Centralisation of the global economy around a digital ledger of all assets and liabilities supervised and controlled by central banks;
Banking as a “human right” – the central banks want all the “unbanked” to be included within centralised identity system, one version of which is the Rockefeller-backed Common Pass;
Vaccine passports as one variant and one pretext for digital identity passports;
The UN Agenda for the 21’st Century and the current targets of 2025, 2030 and 2050 for various of the sustainable development goals (SDG);
mRNA technology and human manipulation or transhumanism.
Some of the above may even be distractions intended to disguise other objectives.
Track and trace
We have seen with the Covid response that governments disguise their desire for surveillance and control; and behind governments are the corporations that profit.
Projects may be contingent on others. The British government for example allocated 35 billion pounds to NHS Track and Trace, ostensibly to link vaccination status to a person’s location and access — yet the project was supposedly scrapped. The government has not said what happened to the money.
Israel launched its Green Pass, though it later withdrew it.
Banking the unbanked
It is all about compliance and before enforcement comes surveillance. The leaders of the Council on Inclusive Capitalism describe themselves as the Guardians and claim their objective is to be sustainable and inclusive. What that means is summarized in an article by Queen Máxima of the Netherlands and Agustín Carstens, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements. In 2020 Agustín Carstens said:
“A key difference with the CBDC is that central banks will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use… and also, we will have the technology to enforce that.”
The pretext is, of course, the climate: to limit your carbon footprint.
That means controlling what you buy and where. If inflation threatens, the banks will limit or block your account. In the case of falling prices, you might get a small extra allowance each month. In order to make such a system work you would not be able to save your money. What you don’t spend expires. In this format CBDC would not be a currency but more like a book of ration vouchers.
They are not letting the principle of vaccine mandates go. Rather than dropping the COVID-19 vaccine mandates for health care workers, South Australia Health this week said it will now be forcing those who refuse to get jabbed to sign a declaration of their refusal.
Doublethink or twice as bright
We are told in George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four” that holding two contradictory ideas, which conflict not just with each other but with what we observe, is voluntary brainwashing.
Yet it is also a measure of intelligence to entertain contradictory ideas, so long as we weigh them.
In February 1936 “Esquire” magazine published F. Scott Fitzgerald’s essay “The Crack-Up” which contained the following:
“Before I go on with this short history let me make a general observation—the test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function. One should, for example, be able to see that things are hopeless and yet be determined to make them otherwise. This philosophy fitted on to my early adult life, when I saw the improbable, the implausible, often the “impossible” come true.”
This is no easy task.
The historian H. Maynard Smith in 1948 wrote in “Henry VIII and the Reformation” that a person who could perceive two conflicting sides of an issue might be overwhelmed by a mentally inflexible person:
“A broad-minded man, who can see both sides of the question and is ready to hold opposed truths while confessing that he cannot reconcile them, is at a manifest disadvantage with a narrow-minded man who sees but one side, sees it clearly, and is ready to interpret the whole Bible, or, if need be, the whole universe, in accordance with his formula.”
What’s the point? The point is the ability to defend yourself.
The technology of neuralink, virtual reality, the metaverse, lab grown meat and synthetic human embryos sourced from more than two people come along at just the time that people are disillusioned with what it is to be human – identity fluid and everything relative. [5]
If you stand back and look at today’s stage with the eyes of an Elizabethan in London in the 1500s, reading the political scene from the limited and censored media of the day, you may conclude that the entities that claim to lead society are performing a victory dance.
Danse macabre
A billionaire recently gave an interview to Tucker Carlson in which he described in detail his techniques of eternal youth.
The obsession with extension of life is not the flip side of avoidance of death but an obsession which embraces both: a man-made liturgy outside of religion.
The latter sees death as rebirth of the soul; the former as the stealing of life from fellow humans, in a zero sum game, in order to perpetuate one’s own.
Look at today’s super rich. Would it benefit even themselves to live forever? The rub. Religion involves Judgement Day; life extension seeks to avoid it.
We can extract religion from the argument. This is not Christian, Muslim or Jew against atheist. It is simply a struggle for domination by those who have stored up their wealth in this world and are terrified of leaving it.
Just as they evade the tax collector in this life, they seek to avoid the possibility of judgement in the next.
Atheists are aware of the contradictions: these are not my words but theirs!
The poster child of atheism Richard Dawkins, Oxford University evolutionary biologist, has rebranded himself a cultural Christian. [6]
If Dawkins has climbed down from his perch as macaw or mockingbird, something has changed. The media used to promote atheists like there was no afterlife, and certainly no tomorrow.
Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris branded themselves The Four Horsemen of the New Atheism. This was no freakshow but a bid for cultural dominance, for a reset or a new build of society. [7]
Let us remind ourselves we are not facing a lifestyle choice. There are people who want us gone. The poet T.S. Eliot wrote in “Christianity and Culture”:
“It is in Christianity that our arts have developed; it is in Christianity that the laws of Europe – until recently – have been rooted. It is against a background of Christianity that all of our thought has significance. An individual European may not believe that the Christian faith is true, and yet what he says, and makes, and does will all spring out of his heritage of Christian culture and depend upon that culture for its meaning…
“I do not believe that culture of Europe could survive the complete disappearance of the Christian faith. And I am convinced of that, not merely because I am a Christian myself, but as a student of social biology. If Christianity goes, the whole culture goes.”
There is no intention to be religiously exclusive. The issue is purely where a civilisation finds its moral roots.
We should be familiar nowadays with the tactical retreat. The transhuman, soulless wonders have not given up the ghost. Their material obsession forbids that.
It is up to us to show them their danse macabre is premature. [8]
The clue is to stop trying to work out someone else’s mind. They may be “Dancing With Mr D” but we are not.
I recommend listening to Elana Freeland interviewed on “Quite Frankly" beginning at 19 minutes and especially to her upbeat rallying call at the end, circa 01:13:30.
“If you abandon your humanity in any way… you will create a vacuum in your soul… Something will fill it, and it is something that you may not want to live with.” [9]
"If a “conspiracy theorist” listens to those who promote themselves as “thought leaders” then we can say, in some cases, such people are one and the same."
Do you know what is meant here?
I am a so-called conspiracy theorist and I *listen* to all sorts.
"You may die before you convince another, so why take a chance?"
Does this mean to try and convince others or not waste one's time?
"If a “conspiracy theorist” listens to those who promote themselves as “thought leaders” then we can say, in some cases, such people are one and the same."
Do you know what is meant here?
I am a so-called conspiracy theorist and I *listen* to all sorts.
Does that make me a "thought leader "? Doubt it.