I thank Democracy Now for publishing the following article by Nandini Naira Archer and Ethan Shone who report on the UK’s continuing complicity in Israel’s ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza by providing another tranche of public funding to the British subsidiary of Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit.
Please note that this post is too long to be read in its entirety by email. Please click on the title to read it on Substack.
Protesters demand closure of Israeli-owned factory in Staffordshire, UK, 30 January 2024
by Martin Pope / Getty Images
The UK government has been accused of being “totally complicit” in the deaths of tens of thousands of people in Gaza after handing a fresh round of public cash to the British arm of Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit.
Elbit reportedly supplies up to 85% of Israel’s drones and land-based military equipment, describing its Hermes 450 drones – which have been used by Israel for strikes on Hamas targets in Gaza in recent months – as “the backbone of the Israeli Defence Forces”.
The arms firm’s chief executive, Bezhalel Machlis, said in November that it had “ramped up” its weapons production “in support of the Israel MOD [Ministry of Defence] and Israel’s security forces”.
Such actions mean the UK government must end all involvement with Elbit, said Samuel Sweek, a spokesperson for Peace and Justice Project, a UK-based campaign group founded by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Sweek told openDemocracy: “Awarding contracts to Israeli arms manufacturers such as Elbit, whose products are being used in the genocidal destruction of Gaza, shows an unrepentant and reprehensible attitude at the top levels of the British government.
“Until they shut down the war machine, call for a permanent ceasefire and an end to the occupation of Palestine, they remain totally complicit in the deaths of over 30,000 innocent men, women and children in Gaza.”
Elbit’s Systems UK has won 25 public contracts, totalling more than £355m, since 2012, according to data supplied by Tussell, which provides details on UK government contracts.
Its latest contract, which is worth £25,000, was awarded four days after thousands marched through central London to call for a ceasefire in Gaza as part of a global day of action last month.
The contract was to deliver training and simulation to American, Lithuanian and NATO military personnel as part of ‘Exercise Furious Wolf’, which focuses on aerial warfare against ‘hostile targets’.
The UK ought to assess all contracts with arms exporters that may be complicit in aiding and abetting atrocity crimes
Gearóid Ó Cuinn, Global Legal Action Network
Palestine Action has previously claimed Elbit has won UK training and simulation contracts as a result of its performances in Israel. A spokesperson for the protest network told openDemocracy that countries that contract and work with Elbit are “complicit in genocide”.
The spokesperson also told openDemocracy that the group would do everything in its power to make the latest contract “an impossible one to fulfil”.
“We successfully compromised a £280m contract with Elbit and the UK’s Ministry of Defence. It can be done again,” the spokesperson said, referring to protests in 2022 that the group claims resulted in Elbit losing two UK public contracts worth a combined £280.
Both Elbit and the government have denied Palestine Action played a role in the contracts’ withdrawal, with justice secretary Alex Chalk claiming the decision related to “revised operational sovereignty standards”.
Ó Cuinn said: “The International Court of Justice has found there to be a real and imminent risk of genocide in Gaza.
“The UK is legally required to prevent genocide and ought to immediately halt weapons exports to Israel and, furthermore, make a legal assessment of all contracts with arms exporters who may be complicit in aiding and abetting atrocity crimes.”
Raytheon, one of the US’s largest weapons makers, also won government contracts relating to space surveillance and tracking in November, Tussell told openDemocracy.
The platform said it had seen 87 contracts, worth more than £6m, awarded to the US firm since 2012.
“It is sickening that arms manufacturers always rack up record returns from wars and shameful that their shareholders profit as a result,” said a spokesperson of the Stop the War Coalition, a co-organiser of the weekly pro-Palestine demonstrations that have been taking place across the UK since October.
“Wars are fought by big powers and it is big business that benefits, with ordinary people always the victims,” they said of Elbit’s latest contract.
Neither the Ministry of Defence nor Elbit Systems UK responded to openDemocracy’s request.
In January, Open Democracy had published the following article by Tom Wall.
Stavit Sinai (second left) and Ronnie Barkan (right) with co-defendants Eliza Sarson-Dimont, Archie Sadler and Finton Owens outside Bristol Crown Court in January 2024 | Martin Pope/Getty Images
Two Israeli dissidents have claimed they damaged the British headquarters of an Israeli-owned drone manufacturer to save Palestinian lives in the first court case of its kind in the UK.
Stavit Sinai and Ronnie Barkan – along with five other pro-Palestinian activists – are accused of burglary and criminal damage for allegedly breaking into the head office of Elbit Systems UK (Elbit UK) on the northern outskirts of Bristol in May 2022. It is thought to be the first time that Israeli nationals have been put on trial after taking part in direct action against an Israeli-owned defence company in the UK. The case continues next week in Bristol Crown Court.
Sinai, who grew up in Haifa, Israel, has accepted she used a sledgehammer and a small glass hammer to break windows in the offices of Elbit UK, which is owned by the Israeli military’s main supplier, Elbit Systems Ltd. Sinai also sprayed red paint from a fire extinguisher on the building.
Sinai, whose mother and father both served in the Israeli Defence Force (IDF), told jurors she wanted “to shut Elbit down to prevent them from engaging in further production of weaponry to be shipped to be used for war crimes and the possible crime of genocide”. She added: “I hoped that innocent people [in Palestine] would be saved from being murdered.”
Sinai, a philosophy teacher who currently lives in Germany, flew to Manchester and then travelled to Bristol to take part in the direct action against Elbit UK.
She said she chose to target a subsidiary company rather than the parent company in Israel because she feared she would have been “shot in the head” if she had done so. She described the site in Bristol as the “nerve centre” of Elbit UK.
She added that the international campaign against apartheid in South Africa had used similar tactics. “Taking action outside of the country where the crimes are taking place… has been proven to be extremely efficient to exert pressure on the perpetrators,” she said.
Barkan, who was born near Tel Aviv and served in the IDF, also caught a train from Manchester to Bristol, where he and Sinai met the other activists from the Palestine Action campaign group. The next day they drove to Elbit UK’s premises in the north of the city.
Barkan, who has been involved in Palestinian protests in the occupied territories since the early 2000s, used a sledgehammer and a glass hammer to break windows. Inside the building, he sprayed two Hebrew messages in red paint translating as “Elbit=Nakba” and “stop Elbit”.
Barkan told the court he wanted to cause “structural damage… so the business could not carry on as usual”.
“This would have a direct impact on the supply chain,” he said, “on the way that these killer machines are being supplied to butcher people in Gaza and elsewhere.”
Barkan said he was “not someone who enjoyed smashing up anything” but it was necessary to shut Elbit down because it was key to Israel’s “system of oppression, domination and terror” in Palestine.
He told jurors he had been shot, beaten, arrested and detained by the IDF during demonstrations in the occupied territories, but had never been convicted of any offence.
The court heard that 20 window units were smashed or destroyed during the action. Red paint was sprayed on the outside and inside of the building, which had to be closed while repairs were made. The owner of the building, Sedgemoor District Council, which purchased it as a commercial investment in 2020, said it did not consent to any damage.
Barkan and Sinai, however, said they had seen comments from the council’s opposition Labour group in 2021 calling for the authority to divest from the property over human rights concerns. Sinai was asked by her barrister Owen Greenhall if she believed the council would have agreed to the damage. “Knowing the full extent of Elbit’s crimes… yes,” she responded.
The attorney general is currently seeking at the Court of Appeal to stop protesters using the defence that they honestly believed organisations affected by direct action would have consented had they known the full facts.
The court was told by Greenhall that there is “a very significant connection” between Elbit Systems UK and the Israeli state. A video played to the jury showed the Israeli ambassador, Tzipi Hotovely, attending the opening of Elbit’s factory in Bristol in the summer of 2023. Hotovely was seen describing products produced by the UK company as “ours” and referring to the firm as an Israeli “defence technology company”.
A document of facts agreed by the prosecution and defence shows that Elbit UK and two of its UK-listed subsidiary companies – UAV Engines Ltd and Instro-Precision Ltd – have been granted 51 licences by the UK government to export military equipment, including drone engines, targeting systems and surveillance systems, to the Israeli state between 2016 and 2021. UAV Engines was granted a further licence in February 2022 to export military aero-engines to Israel Aerospace Industries, which is owned by the Israeli state.
The court was told by Greenhall that Elbit UK’s Israeli parent company Elbit Systems Ltd supplies 85% of land-based equipment used by the Israeli military, with the firm marketing its drones as the “backbone of the Israeli Defence Force”.
The case also saw a senior Elbit executive give evidence in a UK court for what is thought to be the first time.
Alan Wright, Elbit UK’s vice president of sales and marketing, said the company's main customers were in the UK, where it provided technology to the aerospace, defence and homeland security sectors. He said the company shipped products to its parent company in Israel for support and repairs. But he insisted it did not supply the Israeli military: “[Elbit UK] does not provide products to the IDF.”
Wright, a director of UAV Engines, denied the UK company had a connection to the Israeli state: “[Elbit UK] operates in the UK as a UK-listed company and therefore operates within the bounds of UK law.”
Under cross-examination by Greenhall, Wright accepted there was a “very significant overlap” between senior staff at Elbit UK and its Israeli parent company “in certain areas”. He also accepted there was a “very large overlap” in the product portfolios of the two companies.
Two of the three executive directors of Elbit UK are also directors of Elbit Systems Ltd.
Wright also accepted that Elbit UK’s profits “flow back to the parent company” in Israel, which has ultimate control over the UK company.
You may recall that in December the Electronic Intifada published a report by Mohamed Elmaazi that a UK jury had delivered a not guilty verdict on nine out of 32 charges brought against eight activists – collectively known as the Elbit Eight – who protested against Israel’s largest private weapons firm Elbit Systems’ operations in the UK.
Meanwhile last Wednesday in Manchester, “Palestine Action targets the Manchester offices of BNY Mellon, which has invested over £10 million in Israel’s largest weapons firm, Elbit Systems.”
