"Charles III: Real King or Servant of the Globalists?" by Julian Rose
"There comes a point where the truth will come out – that people see through the deception, that people will see what is real – they won't put up with the lies anymore." – Richard Vobes
I previously posted the following article by Julian Rose on Facebook last year which bears repeating, re-reading. Afterwards I have included two very interesting videos from Richard Vobes which I recommend watching.
❝There comes a point where the truth will come out – that people see through the deception, that people will see what is real – they won't put up with the lies anymore.❞ – Richard Vobes
By Julian Rose • Hardwick Alliance • 26 September 2022
The death of Queen Elizabeth II and the inheritance of the British throne by her eldest son Charles, can either be viewed as a significant event holding the possibility of positive change, or the further manifestation of a beguiling and deceptive show of imperial/colonial self importance.
It’s too early to know which way the pendulum will swing, but well over half the British public still supports the existence of a monarchy and turns out in large numbers to express their approval of the theatre that remains an enduring part of the British love affair with tradition and the uncompromisingly expensive and pompous spectacle that surrounds the great majority of royal occasions.
King Charles III takes the throne at a time of great uncertainty and insecurity for all people, not just the population of Great Britain. The United Kingdom, like many other countries, is locked into a seemingly insoluble set of political and economic upheavals, all symptomatic of the dominant globalist regime of the past three/four decades.
Most of what provides the appearance of worldly significance for the UK comes from what is referred to as its ‘special relationship’ with the USA. This means letting US top brass decide the UK’s role in the geopolitical machinations of an international power struggle and then entering into collusion with UK officialdom over how this will be financed and spun by the global media.
The brutal wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria were largely Anglo-American planned and executed events taken up later by the European Union as a show of what is called ‘international solidarity’.
But recently a whole new dimension of power has imposed itself on the socio-economic and cultural pattern of the UK, Europe, North America and beyond. This power heist is that of the World Economic Forum (WEF) operating in full collaboration with the United Nations (especially its World Health Organisation) along with the corporate giants that dominate the global economy.
This is especially true when it comes to the machinations of the privately controlled and debt-creating central banking system that’s led by the secretive and almost unknown Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Controversially, King Charles III has been revealed to be in very close collaboration with the WEF’s executive director Klaus Schwab. In 2020, Charles gave the opening address to the WEF Summit at Davos where The Great Reset was formally announced.
The Great Reset, let us remind ourselves, comprises ‘The Green New Deal’, ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution’, the UN’s seventeen ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ and the ‘Zero CO2’ global warming/climate change imperative that originated at the Club of Rome, itself an active participant in this small cabal of ‘hidden government’ which seeks total domination of global affairs and global wealth.
The vast majority of the public have no idea that their new king appears to support the imposition of The Great Reset, which according to Klaus Schwab, involves merging human beings into digitally controlled ‘trans-human’ cyborgs that will represent ‘a great advancement’ of civilisation here on Earth. Indeed, Schwab’s chief advisor, Yuval Noah Harari, recently stated “We will create non-organic humans … we will do better than God”.
As Prince, Charles made a name for himself as an upholder of environmental causes, traditional architecture and organic farming. How is it possible that he could stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Klaus Schwab giving support to his widely stated claim that, as part of The Great Reset, the human race will have to live on a diet of petri-dish propagated laboratory foods and processed insects? Not to mention Schwab’s now famous declaration that under The Great Reset “You will own nothing, and will be happy”.
Many see Charles as having a broadly humanitarian outlook and a certain ease with working class people and farmers. But, as a stated supporter of The Green New Deal, he is putting his weight behind the end of independent family farming by introducing in its place sterile robotic agricultural mechanisms, synthetic laboratory foods and ‘rewilded’ countryside, likely offering shooting and hunting opportunities for the privileged, but little artisan or useful silvicultural activity for those skilled people who traditionally provide the stewardship of our countryside and rural communities.
The new king was schooled in the ‘environmental sustainability’ movement of the 1980s and 1990s. Leading non-governmental figureheads of this movement adopted an elitist view on how to manage the resource base to counteract so-called ‘global warming’. They believed in the false science of the government-backed International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and its wholly contrived rhetoric that global warming is the result of excessive CO2 production of industrial nations and that only a major cut back in the use of fossil fuel could ‘save the planet’.
This belief is the basis of the WEF’s entire policy agenda, including achieving ‘Zero CO2’ by 2040.
Stopping global warming is the excuse for collapsing the present economy and shifting all energy production into a fake green programme of centralised and corporate owned ‘alternative’ power sources, drawing heavily on scarce finite resources of rare minerals and use of high energy demanding metals for the construction of large scale wind and photovoltaic energy farms.
Could Charles, famed for his support of organic agriculture, really be in support of the WEF’s plan to subject the general public to a diet of insects, cultured fake meat and dairy products to replace real food by 2030? Is he so high-tech appeased to believe in the proclamation by Schwab that “At the end, what the Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital and our biological bodies.”
As Charles takes the throne an extraordinary clash of powers are playing out their end game agenda. On the one hand, the vast corporate global power matrix is backing a frighteningly mechanistic, digital and algorithmically controlled future. A future dominated by weaponised 5, 6 and 7G electromagnetic wave pulses powering control grid based ‘smart cities’ to be inhabited by disenfranchised country dwellers.
On the other hand, a new wave of awareness is rising which holds Man as sacred and his environment as a priceless gift in need of a whole new form of benign and common sense stewardship that contains the true and human-scale values of real ecology.
King Charles will swear his Coronation Oath on his official day of inauguration. His mother did the same at her Coronation in 1953. This oath states that the King will remain loyal to protecting the well-being and safety of his subjects and to guard the independent sovereignty of the nation.
His mother, for whatever reason, failed the citizens of Great Britain in this respect. She sold out to the globalists and supranational authority of the European Union.
UK citizens have clawed back one of these losses. Will King Charles III be true to his Coronation Oath? Will the rulings of 1215 Magna Carta re-emerge from their present obscurity and be proclaimed as the foundation for the future of the British Isles? Will the never-revoked constitutional Common Law of the people rise up to force the lawless elite cabal off their Masonic pedestals of power?
Perhaps the people of Great Britain will finally wake up to the fact that the royal chimera played out daily on their TV screens is nothing but a tool of simple deception that’s designed to soften and obscure the stark realities of a world governed by fascist sentiments and an advanced array of high-tech weaponry for the imposition of the digital hypnosis of the masses.
Whichever way it goes, ‘waking up’ remains the highest imperative and we, the people, need to recognise—and act on—our rightful and lawful authority to lead, and not leave it to the unelected and unaccountable masters of pomp and spin.
Julian Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, writer, international activist, entrepreneur and holistic teacher. He is President of The International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside and Co-founder of the Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology HARE. His latest book ‘Overcoming the Robotic Mind—Why Humanity Must Come Through’ is strongly recommended reading for this time: see www.julianrose.info
In this video by Richard Vopes from March 2023, he interviews Gloria Moss and Justin Walker regarding questions about the signing of Queen Elizabeth’s oath in 1953. They also discuss concerned. This discussion provides some background as to why it is so important to read and understand the Coronation Oath Charles III signed today.
This is a companion piece to the video discussion above written by Gloria Moss.
A challenging disclosure researched and written by Professor Gloria Moss in consultation with and commissioned by the Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology
As the mainstream media focus on Harry and Meghan and whether or not they will attend the Coronation on May 6th, a grave constitutional problem demands our attention concerning His Majesty and the Coronation Oath that he is due to take. This article discusses the overwhelming constitutional importance of this oath and its role in protecting the interests and freedoms of the people of Britain and the Commonwealth.
Given His Majesty’s proclaimed support for the highly controversial World Economic Forum (WEF), with its global social, economic and ‘climate change’ agendas that will directly affect all of our freedoms and liberties, it is crucial that there is now immediate clarity and reassurance around his primary allegiances and constitutional responsibilities to the people of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth. This needs to be offered before the Coronation and needs to be in the form of a formal ‘Declaration’ that gives these assurances of his essential constitutional responsibilities to Britain, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth and that they are enshrined in the Coronation Oath. In addition, there needs to be a ‘Royal Retraction’ of His Majesty’s support for the Davos–based WEF. An urgent ‘Call to Action’ is now needed and this is included at the end of this article.
The Coronation is much more than ceremonial According to a report by the House of Commons Library on the Coronation released in February 2023, the oaths taken and the coronation ceremony not only have religious and ceremonial importance but also constitutional significance (Torrance, 2023, p.5). For although academics at the University College London’s Constitution Unit seek to reduce the value of the oath to something of ‘symbolic significance’ only (Hazell and Morris, 2022, p.10), the House of Commons Report speaks of a legal requirement on the part of the Monarch to swear an oath to govern the peoples of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth ‘according to their respective laws and customs’. With the Coronation less than two months away, the constitutional role of the Coronation Oath and its content must now become a matter of major and immediate public concern.
Indeed, Charles himself stated in 2021 that ‘if you become the sovereign then you play the role in the way that is expected’ (Llewelyn, 2021). So, this article explores the part played by the Coronation Oath in the nation’s constitutional affairs; the historical forms of previous Coronation Oaths, including the one used by Queen Elizabeth II; and finally steps that should be taken to ensure that Charles’ Coronation Oath is not only strictly constitutional but confirmatory of the ancient Common Law Constitution of England and Wales (Scotland is a mixture of both Common Law and Civil Law and Northern Ireland has its roots in Irish Common Law).
I also recommend watching Richard Vope’s video from earlier today, “The King that nobody wanted.”
“…Because they bought the crown estate they effectively owned the king and this man who was soon to become king and indeed his mother could not enter this square mile without asking permission and it was estrange because the bankers would often laugh at them and say,
“Look at this strange juxtaposition there you are the king or the queen uh of your land and yet we really are the rulers for we have the money you see and without the money you are nothing.”
Richard Vobes has the notion that another oath is sworn around the back.
That would make sense.
Is his oath Charlie d'Turd's oath online yet?