This is a very interesting update with regard to Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson’s lawsuit.
Brook Jackson Fraud Suit News
The Vaccine Wars Part LVIII
By Mathew Crawford • October 4, 2022
A few weeks ago Liam Sturgess and I had the opportunity to talk with Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson and one of her attorneys about her lawsuit against Pfizer, which is potentially the largest lawsuit in history in dollar terms. There are a lot of recent updates on the suit, which you can follow at her Twitter account.
Enough was said on Twitter that I called Brook and we talked for an hour about the case. Understand that of all the topics I write about, I feel least comfortable with the nitty gritty details of legal work. While I did not skip learning about the Constitution in school, and argued Amendment violations routinely in high school and college policy debate, my eyes get weary faster when it comes to reading legal docs. So, forgive me if I make any missteps and feel free to educate me in the comments.
Will The Federal Government Allow This Trial?
That's no small question. If the government has a plan, that plan will dictate how far this case goes. The government could have simply disallowed the case, but it was allowed to proceed.
Now we're at the point at which a judge is deciding whether to accept Pfizer's motion to dismiss the trial.
🚨IMAGINE: We survive the motions to dismiss & we will depose the Pfizer CEO, FDA, CBER, CDC, receive their internal communications, depose trial investigators & site staff & may even be allowed to interview Bill Gates. That’s how huge this case is! https://t.co/UrRezWIM3PThe False Claims case against Pfizer’s product that I filed in 2021 has been described as “the biggest in U.S. history.” There is an ongoing effort to keep the public from knowing about & following the case. Today, we start to fight back! Stay tuned 💜 #survivetodiscoveryBrook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJacksonThe judge is deliberating over whether to allow discovery. The implications of this decision could not be larger!
A judge in Beaumont, TX is deciding at this very moment if discovery will be allowed in my False Claims case alleging misbranding of Pfizer’s Covid shot due fraud in the clinical trials. With discovery, Pfizer CEO won’t be given the option to pull out. He will be deposed! https://t.co/7bLdYLW0zDPfizer CEO pulls out of testifying to EU Parliament COVID panel What a coward. https://t.co/NLijZ5bNS5Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJacksonWhile the government did not stop the lawsuit from moving forward, it had now submitted a statement of interest supporting Pfizer's motion to dismiss the suit.
🚨🚨BREAKING: The United States of America submitted a statement of interest supporting Pfizer’s motion to dismiss the False Claims lawsuit. @CovidLawCast @ChangeAkronNow @barnes_law @thevivafreiPerhaps a legal expert understands this course of action better than I, but I'm scratching my head. This took place aside from the government's disagreement with Pfizer over the suggestion that the pharmaceutical giant's actions were a-okay because it acted at the behest of the government. But isn't that at the core of Pfizer's motion to dismiss?
I'm confuzzled.
Those in power have unlimited means to continue to push the mRNA products, all mandates, & other Covid-19 countermeasures. What they are losing more of is public trust. The more we resist the weaker they become. Demand action from your elected officials. @KateTalksTruthWATCH—John Kirby who is double boosted and is positive himself during this interview, tries to defend losing 20K military members over the mandates that don’t prevent soldiers from getting sick. https://t.co/QOLSp4ndbYKate @KateTalksTruthIf the case goes to discovery, that process will be historically costly—perhaps a million dollars of work per month. I made an offer through Brook to consult pro bono. Brook is a member of Operation Uplift, and one of our primary goals is to support one another.
Remember that there has never been a moment in time when authorities had good evidence that the gene therapy products they're calling "vaccines" were safe and effective.
Illegitimacy of Pfizer's Vaccine Trials
A few weeks ago I published an article that felt speculative, but important at the time.
Though 20,000 people have read the article, and I've talked with numerous testing and vaccine experts, nobody is aware of any documentation showing that the PCR tests used in the Pfizer trial were validated as having similar sensitivity and specificity among the vaccinated as with the unvaccinated. Talking to Brook tonight I found out that the PCR tests were all sent to Pfizer's own laboratory at Pearl River to be processed.
Huh.
Warner Mendenhall
I just discovered Warner Mendenhall's Substack today, so I subscribed. Brook says so many good things about him that I'm happy to provide a small financial contribution that way. Mendenhall has subsidized numerous cases during the pandemic, with a pretty good win record.
Addendum
I forgot to mention something important Brook told me. The government is three days behind in releasing Pfizer data!
This matters because Brook is working hard to go through that data for her case!
Hmmmm…
The original post is here: