Retired British diplomat and journalist, Craig Murray has written the following important article regarding ongoing dodgy legal machinations by the Starmer government via the British judiciary in relation to charges against people for holding signs in silence which had the name of the relatively recently proscribed organisation, Palestine Action on them.
I recall the Southport stabbings. I recall Blackstone's "Commentaries On The English Law" in which he discusses the sacrifice of some of the freedoms of the jungle, jungle law, to gain the safety and surety of the civil law. One would have thought surely such surety would be that your daughters could attend a dance studio and not be stabbed in broad daylight three dead? One would have thought such a garish stabbing would surely fit the description of the civil law being stabbed in broad daylight; the very law of civilisation itself violently assaulted? Apparently, some social media comment suggested the assailant was a then recent illegal of Islamic background. The facts were that the assailant was of Haitian origin, by then in England some considerable number of years and a Christian. First, one is no longer a Christian if such an act is performed; that right disappeared when the knife came out. Second, does it matter when or where the assailant was from? With the civil law itself being savaged that day one would have thought Starmer would have demanded the assailant face the full force of the law. Instead Starmer chose to gaslight Britain about 'Nazis' making 'racist' social media comments that would indeed feel the full force of the law. The dead got a few flowers in a quick photo op. I was later informed that Starmer is a hard longstanding 68er. Understood.
Why on earth is the west going full facist just to support Israel?
I recall the Southport stabbings. I recall Blackstone's "Commentaries On The English Law" in which he discusses the sacrifice of some of the freedoms of the jungle, jungle law, to gain the safety and surety of the civil law. One would have thought surely such surety would be that your daughters could attend a dance studio and not be stabbed in broad daylight three dead? One would have thought such a garish stabbing would surely fit the description of the civil law being stabbed in broad daylight; the very law of civilisation itself violently assaulted? Apparently, some social media comment suggested the assailant was a then recent illegal of Islamic background. The facts were that the assailant was of Haitian origin, by then in England some considerable number of years and a Christian. First, one is no longer a Christian if such an act is performed; that right disappeared when the knife came out. Second, does it matter when or where the assailant was from? With the civil law itself being savaged that day one would have thought Starmer would have demanded the assailant face the full force of the law. Instead Starmer chose to gaslight Britain about 'Nazis' making 'racist' social media comments that would indeed feel the full force of the law. The dead got a few flowers in a quick photo op. I was later informed that Starmer is a hard longstanding 68er. Understood.